Water, Land and Ecosystems - Uganda https://wle.cgiar.org/country/uganda en Predictable patterns of unsustainable intensification https://wle.cgiar.org/predictable-patterns-unsustainable-intensification <div class="metadata-field field-type"><strong class="label-above">Type</strong>Journal Article</div><div class="metadata-field field-language"><strong class="label-above">Language</strong>en</div><div class="metadata-field field-author"><h2 class="label-above">Authors</h2><ul><li>Rietveld, Anne M.</li><li>Groot, Jeroen C.J.</li><li>Burg, Margreet van der</li></ul></div><img typeof="foaf:Image" src="https://wle.cgiar.org/sites/default/files/Predictable_Rietvield_2021.pdf_.jpg" width="228" height="300" alt="" /><div class="field-abstract"><div class="field-content">To increase understanding of agricultural intensification processes over time and their sustainability, we studied dimensions of sustainability in the context of ongoing expansion of intensive, commercial mono-cropping of banana in Southwestern Uganda. In our approach we considered five dimensions of sustainability: economic, agricultural productivity, environment, social and human. We compared farming systems in 1998 and 2018 and integrated a gender lens. A total of four focus group discussions, two group interviews and fifteen individual interviews (8m / 7f) were conducted, complemented with a discourse analysis of newspaper articles. Results show that although intensification of banana production increased the average income level indicating improvement in the economic dimension, it did not yield sustainable outcomes in the other dimensions. The integrated analysis of five dimensions of sustainability illuminated aspects often neglected in assessment studies or policy-making around agricultural intensification, in particular socio-economic and gender dynamics. We further recognized that the observed local trends are part of a set of patterns that take place throughout the world. We conclude that to advance sustainable development, stakeholders should move away from the current over-emphasis on economic values prioritizing the individual, and that avoiding patterns of unsustainable development requires broadening to environmental and community values.</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-pdf-url"><h2 class="label-above">Download</h2><ul><li><a href="https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/rest/bitstreams/3697f5da-ac7e-46c9-91ea-b6e5d25efe5a/retrieve" target="_blank" absolute="1">Download PDF</a></li></ul></div><div class="field-citation metadata-field"><h2 class="label-above">Citation</h2><div class="field-content">Rietveld, A.; Groot, J.C.J.; Van der Burg, M. (2021) Predictable patterns of unsustainable intensification. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, Online first paper (24 June 2021). ISSN: 1473-5903</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-status"><h2 class="label-above">Accessibility</h2>Open Access</div><div class="metadata-field field-permalink"><h2 class="label-above">Permalink</h2><a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114143">https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114143</a></div><div class="field-altmetric-embed"><div class="altmetric-embed" data-badge-popover="right" data-badge-type="medium-donut" data-doi="https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2021.1940731"></div></div> Wed, 29 Dec 2021 12:41:38 +0000 Anonymous 19908 at https://wle.cgiar.org https://wle.cgiar.org/predictable-patterns-unsustainable-intensification#comments Diversity in nutrient content and consumer preferences of sensory attributes of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties in Ugandan agroecosystems https://wle.cgiar.org/diversity-nutrient-content-and-consumer-preferences-sensory-attributes-peanut-arachis-hypogaea-l <div class="metadata-field field-type"><strong class="label-above">Type</strong>Journal Article</div><div class="metadata-field field-language"><strong class="label-above">Language</strong>en</div><div class="metadata-field field-author"><h2 class="label-above">Authors</h2><ul><li>Nankya, Rose</li><li>Mulumba, John W.</li><li>Lwandasa, Hannington</li><li>Matovu, Moses</li><li>Isabirye, Brian</li><li>Santis, Paola de</li><li>Jarvis, Devra I.</li></ul></div><img typeof="foaf:Image" src="https://wle.cgiar.org/sites/default/files/Diversity_Nankya_2021.pdf_.jpg" width="212" height="300" alt="" /><div class="field-abstract"><div class="field-content">The cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is one of the most widely consumed legumes globally due to its nutrient content, taste, and affordability. Nutrient composition and consumer preference were determined for twenty local farmer (landrace) and commercial peanut varieties grown in the Nakaseke and Nakasongola districts of the central wooded savanna of Uganda through sensory and laboratory evaluation. Significant differences in nutrient content (p &lt; 0.05) among peanut varieties were found within and across sites. A significant relationship between nutrient content and consumer preference for varieties within and across sites was also realized (Wilk’s lambda = 0.05, p = 0.00). The differences in nutrient content influenced key organoleptic characteristics, including taste, crunchiness, appearance, and soup aroma, which contributed to why consumers may prefer certain varieties to others. Gender differences in variety selection were significantly related to consumer preference for the crunchiness of roasted peanut varieties (F = 5.7, p = 0.016). The results imply that selecting different varieties of peanuts enables consumers to receive different nutrient amounts, while experiencing variety uniqueness. The promotion of peanut intraspecific diversity is crucial for improved nutrition, organoleptic appreciation and the livelihood of those engaged in peanut value chains, especially for the actors who specialize in different peanut products. The conservation of peanut diversity will ensure that the present and future generations benefit from the nutritional content and organoleptic enjoyment that is linked to unique peanut varieties.</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-pdf-url"><h2 class="label-above">Download</h2><ul><li><a href="https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/rest/bitstreams/e74482fa-1967-4040-b8ba-55ab74ff46e0/retrieve" target="_blank" absolute="1">Download PDF</a></li></ul></div><div class="field-citation metadata-field"><h2 class="label-above">Citation</h2><div class="field-content">Nankya, R.; Mulumba, J.W.; Lwandasa, H.; Matovu, M.; Isabirye, B.; De Santis, P.; Jarvis, D.I. (2021) Diversity in nutrient content and consumer preferences of sensory attributes of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties in Ugandan agroecosystems. Sustainability 13:2658 15 p. ISSN: 2071-1050</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-status"><h2 class="label-above">Accessibility</h2>Open Access</div><div class="metadata-field field-permalink"><h2 class="label-above">Permalink</h2><a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10568/112989">https://hdl.handle.net/10568/112989</a></div><div class="field-altmetric-embed"><div class="altmetric-embed" data-badge-popover="right" data-badge-type="medium-donut" data-doi="https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052658"></div></div> Wed, 29 Dec 2021 12:41:38 +0000 Anonymous 19903 at https://wle.cgiar.org https://wle.cgiar.org/diversity-nutrient-content-and-consumer-preferences-sensory-attributes-peanut-arachis-hypogaea-l#comments Towards good e-flows practices in the small-scale hydropower sector in Uganda https://wle.cgiar.org/towards-good-e-flows-practices-small-scale-hydropower-sector-uganda <div class="metadata-field field-type"><strong class="label-above">Type</strong>Journal Article</div><div class="metadata-field field-language"><strong class="label-above">Language</strong>en</div><div class="metadata-field field-author"><h2 class="label-above">Authors</h2><ul><li>O’Brien, G. C.</li><li>Dickens, Chris W. S.</li><li>Mor, C.</li><li>England, M. I.</li></ul></div><img typeof="foaf:Image" src="https://wle.cgiar.org/sites/default/files/H050614_tn.png" width="540" height="702" alt="" /><div class="field-abstract"><div class="field-content">Stakeholders of the small-scale (&lt;50 MW generation capacity) hydropower sector in Uganda recognise the importance of sustainable development of the resources that have social and ecological importance. Uganda is experiencing a boom in hydropower projects resulting in over generation of electricity and its exportation to neighbouring nations. Limited policies are currently available in Uganda to direct the sustainable development of this sector. Environmental flows (e-flows) practices established for the Nile Basin region and international good e-flows practices can contribute to sustainable management of hydropower developments in Uganda. The paper defines and explains e-flows, identifies water resource attributes of importance for e-flows determination associated with hydropower and threat associated with this activity in Uganda, and provides good e-flows determination and management practices based on regional and international information. The determination and management of e-flows in the hydropower sector in Uganda is largely dependent on the availability of and quality of hydrology, hydraulic and flow-ecosystem and flow-ecosystem service relationship information. This review of good-practice e-flows practice for the small hydropower sector in Uganda provides guidance to support multiple stakeholders of water resources in Uganda for a better future for all of its vulnerable communities and the environments they depend on.</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-pdf-url"><h2 class="label-above">Download</h2><ul><li><a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.579878/pdf" target="_blank" absolute="1">Download</a></li></ul></div><div class="field-citation metadata-field"><h2 class="label-above">Citation</h2><div class="field-content">O’Brien, G. C.; Dickens, Chris W. S.; Mor, C.; England, M. I. 2021. Towards good e-flows practices in the small-scale hydropower sector in Uganda. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9:579878. [doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.579878]</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-status"><h2 class="label-above">Accessibility</h2>Open Access</div><div class="metadata-field field-research-theme"><strong class="label-above">Research Themes</strong><ul class="comma-list"><li><a href="/research/themes/variability-risks-and-competing-uses" typeof="skos:Concept" property="rdfs:label skos:prefLabel" datatype="">Variability, Risks and Competing Uses</a></li></ul></div><div class="metadata-field field-permalink"><h2 class="label-above">Permalink</h2><a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114833">https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114833</a></div><div class="field-altmetric-embed"><div class="altmetric-embed" data-badge-popover="right" data-badge-type="medium-donut" data-doi="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.579878"></div></div> Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:36:32 +0000 Anonymous 19680 at https://wle.cgiar.org https://wle.cgiar.org/towards-good-e-flows-practices-small-scale-hydropower-sector-uganda#comments Potential for soil organic carbon sequestration in grasslands in East African countries: A review https://wle.cgiar.org/potential-soil-organic-carbon-sequestration-grasslands-east-african-countries-review <div class="metadata-field field-type"><strong class="label-above">Type</strong>Journal Article</div><div class="metadata-field field-language"><strong class="label-above">Language</strong>en</div><div class="metadata-field field-author"><h2 class="label-above">Authors</h2><ul><li>Tessema, Bezaye</li><li>Sommer, Rolf</li><li>Piikki, Kristin</li><li>Söderström, Mats</li><li>Namirembe, Sara</li><li>Notenbaert, An Maria Omer</li><li>Tamene, Lulseged D.</li><li>Nyawira, Sylvia</li><li>Paul, Birthe K.</li></ul></div><img typeof="foaf:Image" src="https://wle.cgiar.org/sites/default/files/Potential_Tessema_2020.pdf_.jpg" width="228" height="300" alt="" /><div class="field-abstract"><div class="field-content">Grasslands occupy almost half of the world&#039;s land area. Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a key indicator of soil fertility and grassland productivity. Increasing SOC stocks (so‐called SOC sequestration) improves soil fertility and contributes to climate change mitigation by binding atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). Grasslands constitute about 70% of all agricultural land, but their potential for SOC sequestration is largely unknown. This review paper quantitatively summarizes observation‐based studies on the SOC sequestration potential of grasslands in six East African countries (Burundi, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda) and seeks to identify knowledge gaps related to SOC sequestration potential in the region. In the studies reviewed, SOC stocks in grasslands range from 3 to 93 Mg C/ha in the upper 0.3 m of the soil profile, while SOC sequestration rate ranges from 0.1 to 3.1 Mg C ha‐1 year‐1 under different management strategies. Grazing management is reported to have a considerable impact on SOC sequestration rates, and grassland regeneration and protection are recommended as options to stimulate SOC sequestration. However, a very limited number of relevant studies are available (n = 23) and there is a need for fundamental information on SOC sequestration potential in the region. The effectiveness of potential incentive mechanisms, such as payments for environmental services, to foster uptake of SOC‐enhancing practices should also be assessed.</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-pdf-url"><h2 class="label-above">Download</h2><ul><li><a href="https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/rest/bitstreams/a771cdcd-cd32-45ba-ac93-1e06f97c426b/retrieve" target="_blank" absolute="1">Download PDF</a></li></ul></div><div class="field-citation metadata-field"><h2 class="label-above">Citation</h2><div class="field-content">Tessema, B.; Sommer, R.; Piikki, K.; Söderström, M.; Namirembe, S.; Notenbaert, A.M.; Tamene, L.; Nyawira, S.; Paul, B. (2020) Potential for soil organic carbon sequestration in grasslands in East African countries: A review. Grassland Science 10 p. ISSN: 1744-697X</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-status"><h2 class="label-above">Accessibility</h2>Open Access</div><div class="metadata-field field-research-theme"><strong class="label-above">Research Themes</strong><ul class="comma-list"><li><a href="/research/themes/restoring-degraded-landscapes" typeof="skos:Concept" property="rdfs:label skos:prefLabel" datatype="">Restoring Degraded Landscapes</a></li></ul></div><div class="metadata-field field-permalink"><h2 class="label-above">Permalink</h2><a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10568/107070">https://hdl.handle.net/10568/107070</a></div><div class="field-altmetric-embed"><div class="altmetric-embed" data-badge-popover="right" data-badge-type="medium-donut" data-doi="https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12267"></div></div> Sat, 10 Jul 2021 11:37:41 +0000 Anonymous 19471 at https://wle.cgiar.org https://wle.cgiar.org/potential-soil-organic-carbon-sequestration-grasslands-east-african-countries-review#comments Circular economy solutions for resilient refugee and host communities in East Africa https://wle.cgiar.org/circular-economy-solutions-resilient-refugee-and-host-communities-east-africa <div class="metadata-field field-type"><strong class="label-above">Type</strong>Brief</div><div class="metadata-field field-language"><strong class="label-above">Language</strong>en</div><div class="metadata-field field-author"><h2 class="label-above">Authors</h2><ul><li>Njenga, M.</li><li>Gebrezgabher, Solomie</li><li>Mendum, R.</li><li>Adam-Bradford, A.</li><li>Woldetsadik, D.</li><li>Okia, C.</li></ul></div><div class="metadata-field field-pdf-url"><h2 class="label-above">Download</h2><ul><li><a href="https://rrr-refugee.iwmi.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/42/2020/09/rrr-in-refugee-settlements-in-africa-project-brief-series-no-1.pdf" target="_blank" absolute="1">Download</a></li></ul></div><div class="field-citation metadata-field"><h2 class="label-above">Citation</h2><div class="field-content">Njenga, M.; Gebrezgabher, Solomie; Mendum, R.; Adam-Bradford, A.; Woldetsadik, D.; Okia, C. 2020. Circular economy solutions for resilient refugee and host communities in East Africa. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). 8p. (Resource Recovery and Reuse (RRR) in Refugee Settlements in Africa: Project Brief Series 1)</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-status"><h2 class="label-above">Accessibility</h2>Open Access</div><div class="metadata-field field-research-theme"><strong class="label-above">Research Themes</strong><ul class="comma-list"><li><a href="/research/themes/rural-urban-linkages" typeof="skos:Concept" property="rdfs:label skos:prefLabel" datatype="">Rural-Urban Linkages</a></li></ul></div><div class="metadata-field field-permalink"><h2 class="label-above">Permalink</h2><a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10568/109549">https://hdl.handle.net/10568/109549</a></div> Sat, 10 Jul 2021 11:37:41 +0000 Anonymous 19507 at https://wle.cgiar.org https://wle.cgiar.org/circular-economy-solutions-resilient-refugee-and-host-communities-east-africa#comments Faecal sludge management in Africa: socioeconomic aspects and human and environmental health implications https://wle.cgiar.org/faecal-sludge-management-africa-socioeconomic-aspects-and-human-and-environmental-health <div class="metadata-field field-region"><strong class="label-above">Regions</strong><ul class="comma-list"><li>Southern Africa</li></ul></div><div class="metadata-field field-type"><strong class="label-above">Type</strong>Report</div><div class="metadata-field field-language"><strong class="label-above">Language</strong>en</div><div class="metadata-field field-author"><h2 class="label-above">Authors</h2><ul><li>United Nations Environment Programme</li><li>International Water Management Institute</li></ul></div><img typeof="foaf:Image" src="https://wle.cgiar.org/sites/default/files/Faecal_sludge_management.jpg" width="290" height="408" alt="" /><div class="metadata-field field-pdf-url"><h2 class="label-above">Download</h2><ul><li><a href="https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/34350" target="_blank" absolute="1">Download</a></li></ul></div><div class="field-citation metadata-field"><h2 class="label-above">Citation</h2><div class="field-content">United Nations Environment Programme; International Water Management Institute. 2020. Faecal sludge management in Africa: socioeconomic aspects and human and environmental health implications. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP); Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). 64p.</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-status"><h2 class="label-above">Accessibility</h2>Open Access</div><div class="metadata-field field-research-theme"><strong class="label-above">Research Themes</strong><ul class="comma-list"><li><a href="/research/themes/rural-urban-linkages" typeof="skos:Concept" property="rdfs:label skos:prefLabel" datatype="">Rural-Urban Linkages</a></li></ul></div><div class="metadata-field field-permalink"><h2 class="label-above">Permalink</h2><a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10568/113608">https://hdl.handle.net/10568/113608</a></div> Fri, 02 Jul 2021 11:35:41 +0000 Anonymous 19421 at https://wle.cgiar.org https://wle.cgiar.org/faecal-sludge-management-africa-socioeconomic-aspects-and-human-and-environmental-health#comments Groundwater availability and use in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of 15 countries https://wle.cgiar.org/groundwater-availability-and-use-sub-saharan-africa-review-15-countries <div class="metadata-field field-region"><strong class="label-above">Regions</strong><ul class="comma-list"><li>Southern Africa</li></ul></div><div class="metadata-field field-type"><strong class="label-above">Type</strong>Book</div><div class="metadata-field field-language"><strong class="label-above">Language</strong>en</div><div class="metadata-field field-author"><h2 class="label-above">Authors</h2><ul><li>Pavelic, Paul</li><li>Giordano, Mark</li><li>Keraita, Bernard N.</li><li>Ramesh, Vidya</li><li>Rao, Tamma</li></ul></div><div class="field-abstract"><div class="field-content">Traditionally, the spread and extent of human settlement beyond the major riparian zones of Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and across many other arid regions of the world, has been determined by availability of groundwater supplies, accessed through hand-dug wells andsprings. In more recent times, groundwater is the preferred means of supplying water to meet the growing demand of the rural, dispersed communities and the small urban towns across SSA. It is estimated that about 100 million of the rural population throughout SSA areserviced by groundwater for domestic supplies and livestock rearing (Adelana and MacDonald, 2008), with most of the villages and small towns having access to groundwater supplies (Masiyandima and Giordano, 2007).</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-pdf-url"><h2 class="label-above">Download</h2><ul><li><a href="https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/rest/bitstreams/a587423c-3623-4071-8e8e-019226372fa1/retrieve" target="_blank" absolute="1">Download PDF</a></li></ul></div><div class="field-citation metadata-field"><h2 class="label-above">Citation</h2><div class="field-content">Pavelic P, Giordano M, Keraita B, Ramesh V, Rao T, eds. 2012. Groundwater availability and use in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of 15 countries. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI).</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-status"><h2 class="label-above">Accessibility</h2>Open Access</div><div class="metadata-field field-permalink"><h2 class="label-above">Permalink</h2><a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10568/33844">https://hdl.handle.net/10568/33844</a></div><div class="field-altmetric-embed"><div class="altmetric-embed" data-badge-popover="right" data-badge-type="medium-donut" data-doi="https://doi.org/10.5337/2012.213"></div></div> Thu, 19 Nov 2020 22:02:41 +0000 Anonymous 16526 at https://wle.cgiar.org https://wle.cgiar.org/groundwater-availability-and-use-sub-saharan-africa-review-15-countries#comments Innovative partnerships for resource recovery & reuse (RRR) https://wle.cgiar.org/innovative-partnerships-resource-recovery-reuse-rrr <div class="metadata-field field-region"><strong class="label-above">Regions</strong><ul class="comma-list"><li>Middle Africa</li></ul></div><div class="metadata-field field-type"><strong class="label-above">Type</strong>Presentation</div><div class="metadata-field field-subject"><strong class="label-above">Subjects</strong><ul class="comma-list"><li>Business models</li><li>Resource recovery/reuse</li></ul></div><div class="metadata-field field-language"><strong class="label-above">Language</strong>en</div><div class="metadata-field field-author"><h2 class="label-above">Authors</h2><ul><li>CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems</li></ul></div><div class="metadata-field field-pdf-url"><h2 class="label-above">Download</h2><ul><li><a href="https://www.slideshare.net/wle_cgiar_media/innovativepartnershipsforrrr-130903230256" target="_blank" absolute="1">Download</a></li></ul></div><div class="field-citation metadata-field"><h2 class="label-above">Citation</h2><div class="field-content">CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). 2013. Innovative partnerships for resource recovery &amp; reuse (RRR).Powerpoint presentation made at World Water Week. Stockholm, Sweden.</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-status"><h2 class="label-above">Accessibility</h2>Open Access</div><div class="metadata-field field-permalink"><h2 class="label-above">Permalink</h2><a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10568/34786">https://hdl.handle.net/10568/34786</a></div> Thu, 19 Nov 2020 22:02:41 +0000 Anonymous 17674 at https://wle.cgiar.org https://wle.cgiar.org/innovative-partnerships-resource-recovery-reuse-rrr#comments Soyabean response to rhizobium inoculation across sub-Saharan Africa: Patterns of variation and the role of promiscuity https://wle.cgiar.org/soyabean-response-rhizobium-inoculation-across-sub-saharan-africa-patterns-variation-and-role <div class="metadata-field field-region"><strong class="label-above">Regions</strong><ul class="comma-list"><li>Middle Africa</li><li>Southern Africa</li></ul></div><div class="metadata-field field-type"><strong class="label-above">Type</strong>Journal Article</div><div class="metadata-field field-language"><strong class="label-above">Language</strong>en</div><div class="metadata-field field-author"><h2 class="label-above">Authors</h2><ul><li>Heerwaarden, Joost van</li><li>Baijukya, Frederick P.</li><li>Kyei-Boahen, S.</li><li>Adjei-Nsiah, Samuel</li><li>Ebanyat, Peter</li><li>Kamai, N.</li><li>Woldemeskel, Endalkachew</li><li>Kanampiu, F.K.</li><li>Vanlauwe, Bernard</li><li>Giller, Ken E.</li></ul></div><div class="field-abstract"><div class="field-content">Improving bacterial nitrogen fixation in grain legumes is central to sustainable intensification of agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. In the case of soyabean, two main approaches have been pursued: first, promiscuous varieties were developed to form effective symbiosis with locally abundant nitrogen fixing bacteria. Second, inoculation with elite bacterial strains is being promoted. Analyses of the success of these approaches in tropical smallholder systems are scarce. It is unclear how current promiscuous and non-promiscuous soyabean varieties perform in inoculated and uninoculated fields, and the extent of variation in inoculation response across regions and environmental conditions remains to be determined. We present an analysis of on-farm yields and inoculation responses across ten countries in Sub Saharan Africa, including both promiscuous and non-promiscuous varieties. By combining data from a core set of replicated on-farm trials with that from a large number of farmer-managed try-outs, we study the potential for inoculation to increase yields in both variety types and evaluate the magnitude and variability of response. Average yields were estimated to be 1343 and 1227 kg/ha with and without inoculation respectively. Inoculation response varied widely between trials and locations, with no clear spatial patterns at larger scales and without evidence that this variation could be explained by yield constraints or environmental conditions. On average, specific varieties had similar uninoculated yields, while responding more strongly to inoculation. Side-by side comparisons revealed that stronger responses were observed at sites where promiscuous varieties had superior uninoculated yields, suggesting the availability of compatible, effective bacteria as a yield limiting factor and as a determinant of the magnitude of inoculation response.</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-pdf-url"><h2 class="label-above">Download</h2><ul><li><a href="https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/rest/bitstreams/df4dd2ca-7d27-4591-a8f2-752f5607ea55/retrieve" target="_blank" absolute="1">Download PDF</a></li></ul></div><div class="field-citation metadata-field"><h2 class="label-above">Citation</h2><div class="field-content">van Heerwaarden, J., Baijukya, F., Kyei-Boahen, S., Adjei-Nsiah, S., Ebanyat, P., Kamai, N., ... &amp; Giller, K. (2018). Soyabean response to rhizobium inoculation across sub-Saharan Africa: patterns of variation and the role of promiscuity. Agriculture, Ecosystems &amp; Environment, 261, 211-218.</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-status"><h2 class="label-above">Accessibility</h2>Open Access</div><div class="metadata-field field-permalink"><h2 class="label-above">Permalink</h2><a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10568/88072">https://hdl.handle.net/10568/88072</a></div><div class="field-altmetric-embed"><div class="altmetric-embed" data-badge-popover="right" data-badge-type="medium-donut" data-doi="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.08.016"></div></div> Thu, 19 Nov 2020 22:02:41 +0000 Anonymous 16852 at https://wle.cgiar.org https://wle.cgiar.org/soyabean-response-rhizobium-inoculation-across-sub-saharan-africa-patterns-variation-and-role#comments Dilemma of nitrogen management for future food security in sub-Saharan Africa – a review https://wle.cgiar.org/dilemma-nitrogen-management-future-food-security-sub-saharan-africa-%E2%80%93-review <div class="metadata-field field-region"><strong class="label-above">Regions</strong><ul class="comma-list"><li>Middle Africa</li></ul></div><div class="metadata-field field-type"><strong class="label-above">Type</strong>Journal Article</div><div class="metadata-field field-language"><strong class="label-above">Language</strong>en</div><div class="metadata-field field-author"><h2 class="label-above">Authors</h2><ul><li>Masso, C.</li><li>Baijukya, Frederick P.</li><li>Ebanyat, Peter</li><li>Bouaziz, S.</li><li>Wendt, J.</li><li>Bekunda, Mateete A.</li><li>Vanlauwe, Bernard</li></ul></div><div class="field-abstract"><div class="field-content">Food security entails having sufficient, safe, and nutritious food to meet dietary needs. The need to optimise nitrogen (N) use for nutrition security while minimising environmental risks in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is overdue. Challenges related to managing N use in SSA can be associated with both insufficient use and excessive loss, and thus the continent must address the ‘too little’ and ‘too much’ paradox. Too little N is used in food production (80% of countries have N deficiencies), which has led to chronic food insecurity and malnutrition. Conversely, too much N load in water bodies due mainly to soil erosion, leaching, limited N recovery from wastewater, and atmospheric deposition contributes to eutrophication (152 Gg N year–1 in Lake Victoria, East Africa). Limited research has been conducted to improve N use for food production and adoption remains low, mainly because farming is generally practiced by resource-poor smallholder farmers. In addition, little has been done to effectively address the ‘too much’ issues, as a consequence of limited research capacity. This research gap must be addressed, and supportive policies operationalised, to maximise N benefits, while also minimising pollution. Innovation platforms involving key stakeholders are required to address N use efficiency along the food supply chain in SSA, as well as other world regions with similar challenges.</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-pdf-url"><h2 class="label-above">Download</h2><ul><li><a href="https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/rest/bitstreams/d8a106ef-1041-42ed-90b1-fec3060e0e33/retrieve" target="_blank" absolute="1">Download PDF</a></li></ul></div><div class="field-citation metadata-field"><h2 class="label-above">Citation</h2><div class="field-content">Masso, C., Baijukya, F., Ebanyat, P., Bouaziz, S., Wendt, J., Bekunda, M. &amp; Vanlauwe, B. (2017). Dilemma of nitrogen management for future food security in sub-Saharan Africa–a review. Soil Research, 55(6), 425-434.</div></div><div class="metadata-field field-status"><h2 class="label-above">Accessibility</h2>Open Access</div><div class="metadata-field field-permalink"><h2 class="label-above">Permalink</h2><a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10568/89021">https://hdl.handle.net/10568/89021</a></div><div class="field-altmetric-embed"><div class="altmetric-embed" data-badge-popover="right" data-badge-type="medium-donut" data-doi="https://doi.org/10.1071/sr16332"></div></div> Thu, 19 Nov 2020 22:02:41 +0000 Anonymous 17442 at https://wle.cgiar.org https://wle.cgiar.org/dilemma-nitrogen-management-future-food-security-sub-saharan-africa-%E2%80%93-review#comments